Check this, The Missing Engine Combo Rule on No Prep Kings & Benefit to older Engines!
Celebrating the diversity of engines and the spirit of fair competition on the No Prep Kings (NPK) circuit, enthusiasts gather around their screens as Three-D, the renowned street racing aficionado, delves into the intricacies of the missing engine combo rule in the latest discussion.
In the high-stakes world of NPK, where cutting-edge technology and top-tier engine combinations reign supreme, Three-D shines a spotlight on the ever-important issue of weight disparity in forced induction setups. Whether it’s a screw blower, ProCharger, or a turbo, racers are pushing the boundaries of speed with the best of the best under the hood.
One intriguing aspect of NPK’s rule set is the equalization of weight for forced induction setups, irrespective of the technology’s vintage. Three-D breaks it down, shedding light on the challenges faced by racers running different engine combos but having to tip the scales at the same weight. The conundrum intensifies as he draws attention to the complexities of classifying engine differences, especially in the ProCharger realm.
A standout point in the discussion revolves around the weight break afforded to the 48 Hemi engine combo compared to its 49 counterpart. Three-D emphasizes that this distinction could have significant implications for affordability within the racing community. As NPK enthusiasts are well aware, the costs associated with staying on the cutting edge can be astronomical. Therefore, any opportunity to level the playing field becomes a crucial talking point.
The advocate for fair play suggests that weight breaks for racers employing older engine combos, like the 48 Nunan, could inject a healthy dose of parity into the competition. The logic is sound: if a 48 combo is delivering slightly less power compared to the latest and greatest, why should it carry the same weight burden? It’s a nuanced perspective that aims to balance the scales, both in terms of performance and financial investment.
Highlighted in the discussion are familiar names like Dominator, Tony McKin, Jim H, Bob Diotti, and Brad, racers who have opted for engines that may not be the absolute pinnacle of technology but are formidable contenders nonetheless. Three-D makes a compelling case for these racers, suggesting that they, too, deserve a fair shot at victory, especially considering the potential 200-horsepower difference between the 48 and 49 Nunan combos.
In a surprising revelation, Three-D challenges the stereotypical image of NPK racers as multi-millionaires, pointing to figures like Damon (Dominator) as examples of those who embody the true spirit of street racing—making the most of what they have.
As the discussion concludes, the call for a reevaluation of the missing engine combo rule resonates. Three-D’s advocacy for a more inclusive and affordable NPK ecosystem reflects the heartbeat of a racing community that thrives not only on speed but on fairness and camaraderie. It’s a rallying cry for a sport that, at its core, is about the passion for racing and the thrill of competition, regardless of the engine’s vintage or the size of the budget.
